Bowlby's 44 thieves


Bowlby’s study of forty-four juvenile thieves (1944)
Aim
·        To study teenage criminals with affectionless psychopathy to see if they are more likely to have had an early separation than those that did not display signs of affectionless psychopathy
·        Bowlby believed there would be a relationship, based on the belief that prolonged separation from the primary caregiver would have a negative impact on social, behavioural, emotional and intellectual development.
·        To provide evidence to support his maternal deprivation hypothesis




Procedure
·        Study was carried out at the London Child guidance Clinic from 1936-39 with a sample group of 44 juveniles who were involved with theft. 31 boys and 13 girls.
·        This sample was compared to the other 44 maladjusted children who didn’t steal/commit crimes. 34 boys and 10 girls.
·         He also looked at case histories (gained by a social worker) and psychological testing results (done by a psychologist) from the child. He looked particularly for patterns in the backgrounds of young people at this clinic to find out why some would become delinquents.
·        Bowlby gained data using unstructured interviews with the mother and child separately. He did this to find out about childhood experiences of separation and the relationship between the child and the mother.
·        Only a few cases were studied because of the depth of the data required, as well as interviews being time consuming.
·        A case conference followed and a tentative diagnosis was formed. He diagnosed the children to have affectionless psychopathy if they had an inability to experience emotionally intense relationships, lacked affectionate behaviour and had a lack of guilt when causing distress to others.
                               

Findings
·        Of the 14 children from the main group identified as affectionless psychopaths, 12 had experienced prolonged separation of more than six months from their mothers in their first two years of life
·        Only 5 of the 30 delinquent children not classified as affectionless psychopaths had experienced separations
·        Only 17% of thieves without affectionless psychopathy had experienced maternal deprivation
·        Bowlby also identified 6 subgroups of children. Those who were normal, depressed, circular (alternating symptoms of depression/over-activity, hyperthymic (symptoms of over activity), affectionless and schizoid (withdrawn and lacking relationships of others).


Conclusion
The young criminals who had a prolonged separation in their first two years of life were several times more likely to exhibit affectionless psychopathy than those who had no such separation. This provides strong support for Bowlby’s deprivation hypothesis.

Evaluation
ü  The case study gathered a lot of detail, both qualitative and quantitative and used triangulation so the data were in-depth, rich and valid.
ü  A control group of the same size from the same clinic matched to the juvenile thieves was used so that the findings of the thieving group could be compared to those of the control group, enabling Bowlby to conclude that the affectionless psychopathic character could be linked to stealing.

û  It has been suggested by Bowlby himself that the findings would be improved had a second control group, comprising ‘normal’ school children were used, as the control group from the study was made from other teenagers from the clinic who had their own emotional problems

û  Bowlby investigated IQ, emotional state, age and experiences with the mother, but there are other important factors in a child’s development which perhaps should have been looked into, such as the relationship with the father and school experiences.